Imagine two neighbours agreeing to exchange tools — I lend you my ladder, you lend me your drill. We both decide that this swap doesn’t mean I lose ownership of my ladder, or you lose your drill; it simply means we’ve made a friendly promise we can both keep when needed.
In a similar way, the recently signed Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) between Malaysia and the United States is not a surrender of sovereignty and hardly a compromise of sovereignty [as explained by this Facebooker HERE].
In his regular contribution to The Star, Prof Datuk Dr Mohd Faiz Abdullah of ISIS Malaysia explained that this treaty-style arrangement is like a mutual handshake: each side voluntarily agrees to certain obligations so that both can gain and operate freely. The idea that Malaysia compromises its independence is therefore misplaced.
Sovereignty isn’t hollow just because we commit to a bilateral understanding — such agreements are normal features of international diplomacy and trade. Mere mentioning of sovereignty in the RTA involving Cambodia, does not tantamount to anything substantive than a political statement. Devil lies in the detail.
A rebuttal of Rafizi by Syahir HERE and Sofrie Anuar in the commentary. Syam Ghaz explained HERE that it is not an apple to apple comparison. Cambodia merely export textiles, apparels and third party exporter of solar for China. While, Malaysia export higher value added goods such as IC, semi-conductors, E&E, etc.
In the ART between the US and Malaysia, it is treated as a shared exchange rather than an imposition, the Star letter shows Malaysia remains in full control of its choices and direction. In short: signing a mutual deal doesn’t mean giving away the keys — it means choosing to cooperate.
Click Here to Read More..