Khalilah Dato' Mohd Talha's reflection, Was Prophet Yusuf the World's First Economist?, is more than an interesting observation about a Qur'anic story. It raises a question that modern economics may have become uncomfortable answering: What is an economy actually for?
Prophet Yusuf's economic wisdom was remarkably simple. When abundance was forecast, he did not ask how much could be consumed, how quickly wealth could be accumulated or how much return could be extracted. He asked how today's abundance could be preserved so that people could survive tomorrow's scarcity.
Somewhere along the evolution of modern capitalism, that priority appears to have been reversed.
In the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament and the Christian Bible, Prophet Yusuf in the Qur'an is the same figure known as Joseph.
Corporate success is increasingly expressed through quarterly earnings, three-year payback periods, ROE, ROA, EPS and the relentless pursuit of higher share prices. Shareholder value has become a dominant measure of corporate performance. Executives are rewarded for increasing market capitalisation, investors demand higher returns and markets punish companies that fail to deliver quickly enough.
Again, there is nothing inherently wrong with profit. Without profit, businesses cannot survive, workers cannot be employed and investment cannot be sustained. But when profit becomes the purpose rather than the means, something fundamental changes.
A factory worker becomes a labour cost. A long-term investment becomes unattractive because its payback takes too long. A rural community becomes an inefficient market. Food production becomes a commodity. Public services become expenditure. A citizen becomes a consumer whose purchasing power matters primarily because it sustains demand.
The individual—the basic unit of an economy—slowly disappears behind the spreadsheet. And the consequences are visible.
The world can produce extraordinary wealth while millions remain unable to secure adequate food, housing or basic necessities. Nations can report impressive GDP growth while households struggle with living costs. Financial markets can celebrate record valuations while communities experience insecurity and declining social mobility.
The contradiction becomes even more troubling when enormous concentrations of wealth translate into enormous concentrations of influence.
In the United States, the growing political and economic influence of billionaires and large corporations has intensified a wider debate about who ultimately shapes economic policy, regulation, taxation and even aspects of foreign policy. Wealth does not merely buy luxury. At sufficient scale, it can buy access, platforms, lobbying capacity and the ability to influence the national conversation.
This raises a profound question: When private wealth becomes powerful enough to influence public priorities, who represents the economic interests of the ordinary individual?
The answer cannot simply be the market.
Markets are extraordinarily effective mechanisms for allocating many resources. But markets do not automatically determine what is socially just, strategically necessary or morally responsible. They respond to purchasing power—not necessarily human need.
A hungry child has a need. A billionaire has purchasing power. Economics must never confuse the two.
This is where the story of Prophet Yusuf becomes particularly uncomfortable for modern economic thinking.
His economic programme was not designed to maximise wealth during seven prosperous years. It was designed to protect society when prosperity disappeared. The measure of success was not the size of a balance sheet but whether people survived the famine.
That is a radically different definition of economic success.
Perhaps modern economics does not need less capitalism. It needs a clearer sense of what capitalism is supposed to serve.
Corporations need profits. Investors deserve returns. Entrepreneurs deserve rewards. But communities need jobs, families need affordable food, children need nutrition, young people need opportunity and nations need resilience.
-------------------
Was Prophet Yusuf the World’s First Economist? A Personal Reflection
Forwarded e-mail from Khalilah Dato' Mohd Talha
Sun, Aug 9, 10:42 PM
I’ve often wondered, long before economics became a subject filled with graphs, jargon, and Nobel Prizes, who first truly understood how to manage scarcity, plan for uncertainty, and protect people from crisis.
Surprisingly, my mind keeps returning to Prophet Yusuf.
When we read his story in the Qur’an, it’s easy to focus on the drama: betrayal, resilience, imprisonment, and eventual rise to power. But look a little closer, and something else quietly unfolds....something strikingly familiar to anyone who has ever studied economics.
Prophet Yusuf’s encounter with the King of Egypt is a central episode in this regard. When tasked with interpreting the King’s dream—of seven fat cows being consumed by seven lean ones, and seven green ears of grain followed by seven dry ones—Yusuf provides an interpretation that extends beyond symbolic exegesis. He articulates a forward-looking assessment in which seven years of agricultural abundance would be succeeded by seven years of scarcity.
What stands out to me is not just that Yusuf interpreted the dream but what he did next. He didn’t stop at explaining. He planned.
He advises the systematic preservation of surplus grain during the years of plenty, alongside moderated consumption to ensure long-term sustainability. It has been compared by some modern commentators to principles associated with resource management, storage policy, and food security planning.
During the subsequent years of famine, the narrative describes Egypt as having sufficient reserves to withstand scarcity, with distribution managed in a way that mitigated social breakdown. In contemporary analytical language, this has been likened to mechanisms of crisis management and counter-cyclical resource allocation.
.To think long-term when everything feels secure. Isn’t that, at its core, what economics tries to teach us even today?
I find this deeply compelling. Because let’s be honest: how often do we, as individuals or even as societies, fail at exactly this? When times are good, we assume they will always be. We spend freely, waste carelessly, and postpone difficult decisions. Yusuf, on the other hand, called for discipline, foresight, and restraint.
And then came the real test...the famine.
Because planning is one thing. Execution is another.
Under Yusuf’s leadership, Egypt didn’t collapse. It didn’t descend into chaos. Instead, it became a place people turned to for survival. Resources were not only preserved, he they were distributed. Managed. Protected.
To me, this is where the story becomes more than just clever planning. It becomes a lesson in responsibility.
Yusuf didn’t seek power for prestige. When he said, “Appoint me over the storehouses of the land; I am a knowledgeable guardian,” I hear something powerful: a claim not just of competence, but of accountability. He was saying, Trust me to do this right.
And perhaps that is what resonates most.
Today, we have economists, policymakers, and financial experts. We have data, models, and technology. Yet crises still catch us unprepared. Inequality persists. Resources are mismanaged.
So I can’t help but ask: have we really moved that far ahead?
Maybe it’s not about calling Prophet Yusuf “the first economist” in a literal sense. That would be too simplistic. But I do think he represents something foundational: the human ability to anticipate, to plan, and to act with both wisdom and integrity for the greater good.
And perhaps that’s the point.
Economics, stripped to its essence, is not just about numbers. It’s about people. About choices. About responsibility in the face of uncertainty.
In that sense, Prophet Yusuf’s story doesn’t just belong to history. It speaks directly to us...here and now.
Goodbye Yellow Brick Road
No comments:
Post a Comment